
|
"What I want people to know about the Land Records of Hawai'i",
Victoria S. Creed, Ph.D
Waihona 'Aina Corp.
King Kamehameha V, Judiciary History Center
August 18, 2005
Background
Waihona 'Aina was formed and incorporated in 1995 by Paige Barber, Hal Hammatt,
Alexander Mawyer, Muriel Seto and myself. Four years ago Kepa Maly took over Paige
Barber's position. It has taken approximately 10 years to get all the Land Commission
claims recorded and onto our web site. The information page on our site documents
describes how we did this and how we have dealt with the inconsistencies in the
records (of which there are many, such as the numbering systems). We have since
added 3 more databases, two of which are still in progress. Over the years we have
changed four times to more robust databases, all their supporting programs and changed
webhosting companies as many times. I mention this because it is part of the growth
and preservation of these documents as electronic data.
Researching Hawaiian History
Where would you
look for a literary source? Perhaps you should also look in the land records. Where
would you look for a land record? You might also look in the literature, including
the oral traditions. Hawaiian history is written on the land, in names commemorating
gods and heroes. This mnemonic device is still useful today. We cannot limit research
to any specific set of records, if the information is to be truly useful.
Last year, while verifying the Hiiakaikapoliopele manuscript at Bishop Museum for
Alu Like, I noted the legend was run in "Ka Hoku o ka Pakipika" newspaper (1862)
by M.J. Kapihenui of Kailua, O'ahu. On inquiring from the Museum if other information
was available for this Kapihenui, I was told nothing more was known of him. A history
of the Hi'iaka manuscript by John Charlot did not mention Kapihenui's background
either The manuscript had come to Bishop Museum
through The Hawaiian Mechanic's Benefit Union, which dissolved in 1893 . The list of members of the Hawaiian Mechanic's Benefit
Union is available at the State Archives. (One name on the list was an ancestor
of one of my neighbors.) But no Kapihenui. This led me to look through all my databases,
and Eureka! In Land Commission Claim 3156 to Meheula, a Kapihenui testifies on behalf
of Meheula for the 'ili of Kanahau in Kailua. Now, for those who might not know,
Kanahau 'ili is the site of a destroyed Hi'iaka heiau. On checking the
Archives for the Kailua 1861-1862 census, the date of the newspaper series, I was
lucky again. A Kapihenui paid his 1859 to 1870 poll taxes. There are no more listings there for him. So, I went to
the Archive's index looking for, perhaps, a death date. Instead, I found a document
from Wm. Is. Kapihenui at Kailua, O'ahu, dated Jan. 11, 1858 (Translated by E.H.
Hart) which is to John Cummins. It states that Cummins' 12 cattle have been over-running
Kanaha [sic Kanahau] and that Wm. Is. Kapihenui will take them to the pound, unless
they are retrieved and paid for. I've no idea why Kapihenui did not claim the land
earlier, but I do know that by the time of the newspaper series, the Kapihenui family
possessed that land. I posit that even much earlier, it is likely that the family
was the keeper of one of the versions of this Pele-Hi'iaka legend along with the
heiau, and that the land connections tie the family to the publication
of the legend.
Mähele Database
There are 14,456 Land Commission records (30,000+ documents) shown on our waihona.com
records as the Mähele database. The originals were produced within an incredibly
short time-span (1846 to 1854) across the island chain. This is a snap-shot or an
incredibly significant time period. These documents provide a unique recording of
a land/cultural change of the Hawaiian kingdom's land holdings unlike any other
in the world. Political and social reasoning, wide-spread disease, and increasing
numbers of citizen's deaths kept some from claiming their worked lands. The government
disallowed other lands people had traditionally used for growing olonä and
koa trees, and transferred them or kept them for the government. Some residents
eschewed the Land Commission process altogether and bought their land outright as
grants. Nevertheless, the majority of land in the Hawaiian Islands is described
in these records with some detail.
In a paper given for the 2000 Hawaiian Maritime History Conference (see waihona.com
website), I stressed the major point I wanted to show: the land records for certain
persons, Hawaiians and foreign navigators and captains alike, are not necessarily
found in the records under their names. In fact, more often than not, the history
of certain persons was found in other records. A departure for foreign lands that
takes on legendary proportions, is that of the high chief Boki. We find repeatedly,
from perhaps 50 claimants, who claimed their land from "the time Boki left" the
Hawaiian Islands (1829) with two ships, the Kamehameha and the Becket
on his trip to the New Hebrides to get sandalwood. A half-dozen claims
are by family members whose kin went off with Boki and never returned. The most
comprehensive accounting in Land Commission claims of a captain's voyages is that
of William Sumner. We find an account of his voyages, however, not in his own claim,
but in testimony given for the property of Chiefess Kekauonohi, upon whose claim
Sumner's house rests, some say (On Greer's Honolulu map see Sumner, 155 directly
across Palace Walk from Kekauonohi, No. 191). Sumner reminds the Land Commissioners
of his complete devotion for all those years to the King and chiefs under whom he
sailed.
The Boundary Commission Records Database
The Boundary Commission records follow Land Commission records (completed by Waihona
'Aina in 2002). The Boundary Commission records, by contrast, provide legal inquiry
into those Mähele awards that had not been surveyed and where boundaries were
not known or given at the time the award was issued. The Big Island has the most
complete inquiry recorded for its lands by Commissioner Rufus Lyman. He wanted to
know boundaries and the stories associated with them and would not let attorneys
or others interrupt his kama'äina witnesses. Today, we are beginning to see
in these documents the recordation of customary law in the Pacific and Hawai'i, and look for future determinations via work
on this project. Peripherally, a good example of an amazing lack of understanding
of Hawaiian customary law can be found in the 107-page record for the ahupua'a of
Waikapu on Maui. Following are some examples:
Commissioner: The word 'Kapoli' has no direct reference to the Springs?
Mr. Hewitt: It has possibly, and some of our kamaainas will testify to that. The
testimony will be that Kapoli means a depression, and it was often used in connection
with a woman's breast, and Kapoli Spring was used as a place that had a special
water - as the place which sustained life. (page 385).
In the testimony of the witness Kamaka Kailianu, there are number of instances of
customary law: the first, that a person could live in two places all his life, as
this gentlemen did, half of the year in Kula and the other half in Waikapu at Maalaea
(p. 417). The second was that the stones in the spring harbored the navals of children
born in the ahupua'a. By placing them there insured that those children would not
desert their parents (p. 421). A third customary law might be that Kapoli Spring
didn't have an exact size (as the court wished and finally determined), despite
the witness, Mr. Kailianu, because the size of the spring depended on the season:
in spring it was larger but in summer and fall it was smaller (p. 421).
Boundary Commission
records, especially those of the Island of Hawai'i, have the most examples of all
the Mähele-linked land records of customary law in Hawaii.
The Royal Patents
The Royal Patents are the final step in the Land Commission award process (see RP database at waihona.com). Jon Chinen's book They Cried
for Help gives numerous instances
of people filing complaints of various kinds without government response to most
of them. Many lost their lands as a result. As I started transcribing the Royal
Patents I was astounded to learn that until t oday
we are still in the process of completing what the Board of the Land Commission
began in 1848. In over 150 years the process is still incomplete!
Through the year 2002, 8,738 of these Patents
had been issued on 8,574 Land Commission Awards. Of these, 208 are non-entries
("No patent issued"), 105 or more are duplicates and cancelled, and about 1500 of
them are only portions of original Land Commission Awards. I am not ready to accurately
calculate how many more patents could be executed, although it might be in the neighborhood
of another thousand, Or, at the other end of the spectrum, if the government is
shown to have taken over many of the non-awarded parcels, then there may be very
few left to finalize.
Distribution of Patents Over Time
In the eight
years after enactment of "land reform" in King Kamehameha III's reign, an
average of 222.75 patents were made per year). During the 8 ½ years of Kamehameha
IV's reign. an average of 432 a year were processed. Kamehameha V processed, in
9 years, an average of 30 a year. In King Lunalilo's reign, 783 patents were executed
during his one year in office. In King Kal?kaua's 17-year reign. 1077 patents (average 63 a year) were executed. In Queen Liliu'okalani's
brief reign of two years, 271 were processed, as well as others in the name of Kal?kaua
when he was traveling abroad (an average of 135 a year). Here is a preliminary analysis
table of the entire time period.
Table RPs (Preliminary Analysis)
|
Signer
|
Regnum
|
No. of years
|
No. of RPs
|
|
King Kamehameha III
|
1825-1854 (1847-1854)
|
8
|
1782
|
|
King Alexander Liholiho, Kamehameha IV
|
(Jan. 11) 1855-1863 (Nov.30)
|
8.5
|
3792 (112 N/A)
3680
|
|
King Lot, Kamehameha V
|
(Nov) 1863-1872 (Dec. 11)
|
9
|
282 (12 N/A)
270
|
|
King W.C. Lunalilo
|
(Jan. 2) 1873-1874 (Feb. 3)
|
1
|
783
|
|
King David Kal?kaua
|
(Feb) 1874-1891 (Jan. 20)
|
17
|
1077
|
|
Queen Liliu'okalani
|
(Mar) 1891-1893 (July)
|
2
|
271
|
|
President Sanford B. Dole
|
(July) 1893-1899
|
30
|
104
|
|
Governor Sanford B. Dole
|
1900-1903 (July)
|
3
|
64
|
|
Governor W. Carter
|
(Sept) 1903-1907
|
4
|
31
|
|
Governor E. Mott-Smith. Act. Gov.
|
1907-1908
|
1
|
4
|
|
Governor W.F. Frear
|
(Feb) 1908-1913 (Sept)
|
6
|
111
|
|
Governor L. Pinkham
|
(Feb) 1914-1917
|
4
|
15
|
|
Governor C.J. McCarthy
|
(Jan) 1918-1921 (Mar)
|
4
|
23
|
|
Governor W.R. Farrington
|
(July) 1921-1927 (Oct)
|
6
|
19
|
|
R.C. Brown, Act. Gov.
|
(Nov) 1927-1928 (Mar)
|
1
|
38
|
|
Governor W.R. Farrington
|
(Apr) 1928-1929 (Jun)
|
1
|
44
|
|
Governor L. Judd
|
(Aug) 1929-1934
|
6
|
30
|
|
C. Hite, Act. Gov
|
1934
|
1
|
2
|
|
Governor J.B. Poindexter
|
1934-1941
|
7
|
44
|
|
C. Hite & E.K. Kai, Act. Governors
|
1942
|
1
|
4
|
|
Governor I.M. Stainback
|
1943-1953
|
10
|
25
|
|
Governor S. King
|
1853-1957
|
4
|
15
|
|
Governor W.F. Quinn
|
1858-1962
|
5
|
23
|
|
|
1963
|
|
None
|
|
BLNR
|
1964-2000
|
36 yrs
|
120
|
It appears to me that while Kal?kaua was practically being held hostage to his foreign
advisers, more than 188 records were expunged from the record. Many of these numbers
show up with new numbers but with the old numbers crossed off and still in place.
Some of these expunged numbers which re-appear under later numbers are sugar lands,
like the present court case for Hilea Ka'u. But others are not sugar lands. Some
of these records probably never got rewritten and there is no way to know how the
ones that do appear were changed. I'm guessing someone deliberately tampered with
the original records. Another indication of probable tampering is that consecutive
numbers are illogically put into differing volumes. Part of this may be due to the
length of time required to get a survey and process a patent, but the practice of
recording in several volumes during the same time period appears to me to be very
suspect.
Land Grants
The Land Grants
are lands belonging to the King, following the Mahele, were used to acquire money
for the Kingdom. These became known as government lands. It is confusing that these
documents, too. are called Royal Patents. Today they are often incorrectly identified
with the Mahele-linked Patents. Begun in 1846, we know that recording them continues
today, as well. Waihona 'Aina, however, only has copies of those up through 1922,
thus far. There are many different kinds of land (grant) patents: lands sold at
auction, lands issued on cash freehold agreement, on special homestead agreement,
on compromise and equitable settlement, on land exchange, on Right of Preference
Lease, and on simple cash purchase. Some of the sales of these lands are announced
in the newspapers of the time and can be seen on the ulukau.org site. A woman called
me and then faxed me all her "papers" wanting to know what she had. It turned out
to be a land grant for a hui in Waialua District, O'ahu, (perhaps Mokuleia).
with a map from the State Archives dated some 20 years later than the grant. Usefully,
the map showed the grant land of former taro patches then being leased for rice
growing. We are aware of both inquiries and law suits concerning perceived improprieties
in certain land transfers. but are not experts in these processes. We do follow
the subject with interest, however.
Summary
Waihona 'Aina is not a title search company. In fact, only the Archives and Bureau
of Conveyances can provide certified copies of these documents. We do provide internet
databases of all documents transcribed, whether in English or Hawaiian, to help
people locate the documents needed and where they may be obtained. In addition,
we allow people to search for words, names, and a host of other information. But
even with the 60,000 records we now have, they are only a very small portion of
those available in the public record. A title researcher recently told me she found
it useful to purchase Waihona 'Aina documents because they were easier to read than
the originals. And that is often true. A large portion of the older documents in
any of these sets of land information are hand-written: some are beautiful and some
are impossible. I confess that I can only transcribe one or two at a time of those
records which are very hard to read. I can do a dozen or more of those in beautiful
handwriting. Some land title companies and land title specialists occasionally give
free lectures on the subject. There are also genealogical societies which may help
others to research family histories. Waihona 'Aina is happy to be able to provide
easy access to many of these records. Mahalo.
Charlot, John, "Pele and Hi'iaka: The Hawaiian-Language
Newspaper Series," Anthropos 93,1998:55-75.
Achiu, Jason, e-mail 3/31/2005, Hawaii State
Archives.
Palapala Inoa o ka Poe ku i ka Auhau o [1859-1870],
ma ka Apana o Koolaupoko Mokupuni o Oahu; in 1859 (page 71, line 19), 1860 (p. 15
line 15), 1861 (p. 14 line 8), 1862 (p. 54 line 1), 1863 (p. 103 line 20), 1864
(p. 15 line 12 Kapihanui listed as "Ko Meheula Kuleana), 1865 (no listing), 1866
(p. 21 line 18), 1870 (p. 15 line 12) Kapihenui 3 ½ acres.
Benton, Richard, Te Matapunenga : A Compendium
of References to Concepts and Institutions of Maori Customary Law, 2003 in progress
Chinen, Jon J., The Great Mahele: Hawaii's
Land division of 1848 ," U.H. Press, 1958, p. 9.
Chinen, Jon J., They Cried for Help,
Xlibris, 2004.
Waihona 'Aina Corp. purchased copies of all
executed patents of this series, which are located at the Land Division of the Department
of Land and Natural Resources
7 Records of Kal?kaua are interspersed thought
other monarchy records and therefore the exact number is still unknown.
Mahele and Land Commission Enactment 1846
|
|